Laser industry news, technology and market intelligence
LasersNewsSubmit a story
Photonics & Research

Super-resolution microscopy broke a limit by changing what is measured

The diffraction limit still holds. What changed is using non-linearity, patterning or single-molecule localisation to extract information the image alone does not contain.

By LasersNews Desk··1 min read
Close-up of a scientist examining samples under a microscope in a laboratory setting.
Photo by Tima Miroshnichenko on Pexels

Abbe's diffraction limit sets the smallest separation two point sources can have and still be resolved in a conventional microscope — roughly half the wavelength. Super-resolution techniques do not violate it. They sidestep it by measuring something other than a direct image.

Structured illumination

Illuminating the sample with a fine periodic pattern produces moiré fringes between the pattern and the sample's structure. Those fringes encode high spatial frequencies that would otherwise fall outside the optical system's passband, shifted down into the range it can transmit.

Recording several images with the pattern at different phases and orientations, then computationally reconstructing, roughly doubles resolution. Fast, gentle and modest in gain.

Depletion approaches

Stimulated emission depletion illuminates with an excitation spot overlaid by a doughnut-shaped depletion beam that switches off fluorescence everywhere except the very centre.

The remaining emitting region is much smaller than the diffraction limit, and scanning it builds an image. Resolution improves with depletion intensity, which is also what limits it: high intensity photobleaches the sample and damages living cells.

Single-molecule localisation

If only a sparse subset of fluorophores emits at any moment, each appears as a well-separated spot whose centre can be located far more precisely than the spot's width.

Repeating over thousands of frames, with different molecules active each time, builds a map from the accumulated positions. Resolution of tens of nanometres is routine.

The cost is time — thousands of frames — which limits imaging of fast dynamics, and the requirement for suitable photoswitchable dyes.

The common thread

Each technique trades something for resolution: structured illumination trades frames and computation, depletion trades light dose, localisation trades time and requires specific chemistry.

Choosing among them means deciding which currency the experiment can afford. Live-cell imaging cannot afford the light dose or the time; fixed samples can afford both. That is why the field has several established techniques rather than converging on one, and why the question is always which trade the biology permits.

This article was produced by the LasersNews AI desk and reviewed by our editors.

Related reading