Super-resolution microscopy broke a limit by changing what is measured
The diffraction limit still holds. What changed is using non-linearity, patterning or single-molecule localisation to extract information the image alone does not contain.

Abbe's diffraction limit sets the smallest separation two point sources can have and still be resolved in a conventional microscope — roughly half the wavelength. Super-resolution techniques do not violate it. They sidestep it by measuring something other than a direct image.
Structured illumination
Illuminating the sample with a fine periodic pattern produces moiré fringes between the pattern and the sample's structure. Those fringes encode high spatial frequencies that would otherwise fall outside the optical system's passband, shifted down into the range it can transmit.
Recording several images with the pattern at different phases and orientations, then computationally reconstructing, roughly doubles resolution. Fast, gentle and modest in gain.
Depletion approaches
Stimulated emission depletion illuminates with an excitation spot overlaid by a doughnut-shaped depletion beam that switches off fluorescence everywhere except the very centre.
The remaining emitting region is much smaller than the diffraction limit, and scanning it builds an image. Resolution improves with depletion intensity, which is also what limits it: high intensity photobleaches the sample and damages living cells.
Single-molecule localisation
If only a sparse subset of fluorophores emits at any moment, each appears as a well-separated spot whose centre can be located far more precisely than the spot's width.
Repeating over thousands of frames, with different molecules active each time, builds a map from the accumulated positions. Resolution of tens of nanometres is routine.
The cost is time — thousands of frames — which limits imaging of fast dynamics, and the requirement for suitable photoswitchable dyes.
The common thread
Each technique trades something for resolution: structured illumination trades frames and computation, depletion trades light dose, localisation trades time and requires specific chemistry.
Choosing among them means deciding which currency the experiment can afford. Live-cell imaging cannot afford the light dose or the time; fixed samples can afford both. That is why the field has several established techniques rather than converging on one, and why the question is always which trade the biology permits.
This article was produced by the LasersNews AI desk and reviewed by our editors.
Related reading

Integrated photonics narrows the gap between laboratory result and manufacturable part
Foundry access and standardised process design kits are doing for photonics roughly what they did for electro…

Metasurface optics are running into the manufacturing question
Flat lenses built from sub-wavelength structures work. Producing them at volume, at yield, with the tolerance…

Photonics found its foundry model, and the effect resembles electronics in the 1980s
Shared process design kits and multi-project wafer runs let a small team design a photonic chip without ownin…
