Beam splitting is how average power turns into throughput

A single spot cannot absorb rising average power without heat accumulation. Many spots at lower power each can, and diffractive optics make that practical.

By LasersNews Desk·16 Jul 2026·2 min read

Detailed view of a CPU socket on a green motherboard, showcasing microprocessor technology. — Photo by Pok Rie on Pexels

Ultrafast source power has risen steadily, and the applications cannot always use it. Heat accumulation limits how much power a single spot can deposit before the process stops behaving athermally. Beam splitting addresses this by distributing the same power across many spots, each operating in the regime that made ultrafast attractive.

How splitting is done

Diffractive optical elements. A patterned optic splits the beam into a fixed array of spots with designed positions and relative intensities. Efficient, robust and inflexible: the pattern is fixed at manufacture.

Spatial light modulators. A programmable liquid crystal device computes a hologram that produces an arbitrary spot pattern, changeable in software. Flexible, lower efficiency, and slower to update.

Multi-beam scanners. Optical arrangements producing several independently steered beams.

Where the gain is real

Applications processing large areas with a repeating pattern benefit most: surface texturing, thin film patterning, perforation arrays, and drilling arrays of identical holes.

Because the spots are produced from one source, they share pulse timing and cannot be individually modulated in the simplest arrangements. That suits repeating geometry and suits arbitrary geometry poorly.

The uniformity problem

The practical difficulty is making the spots identical. A diffractive element produces a designed intensity distribution, but manufacturing tolerances, alignment and the input beam's own profile all cause variation between spots.

Where the process is threshold-driven — as ablation is — small intensity variation produces visible differences in the result. Spots at the edge of the array frequently differ from those at the centre.

Characterising and compensating that variation is a substantial part of commissioning a multi-beam system, and it is where the difference between a demonstration and a production process usually sits.

The economic case

A source producing more average power than a single spot can use is capacity being wasted. Splitting converts that into parallel throughput at the cost of optical complexity and uniformity control.

For high-volume area processing that arithmetic is compelling, which is why multi-beam configurations have become standard in display, photovoltaic and surface functionalisation equipment rather than remaining a laboratory technique.

This article was produced by the LasersNews AI desk and reviewed by our editors.